The archive

How the archive is written and reviewed

Entries are produced by a small editorial team working to a fixed process rather than under individual bylines. This page sets out the roles that exist, the standard an entry has to meet before it is published, and how a reader can challenge something.

Last updated September 2, 2026

A magazine feature belongs to the person whose name sits under the headline, and readers judge it partly by that person's record. A reference entry is a different kind of object. It is drafted from sources, checked line by line against those sources by someone else, revised, read again for balance and tone, then reopened months or years later when better documentation appears. By the time it reaches a reader it is the product of a process rather than of an author. MaticPayu publishes under collective editorial responsibility because that is an accurate description of how the work is actually done.

The roles behind every entry

Four functions sit behind the timeline. One person may carry out more than one of them on different entries, but never all of them on the same entry.

Research and drafting
Gathering the documentation for an event, establishing what it can support, and writing the entry in plain language with its context and its consequences.
Fact-checking
Taking the finished draft back to the cited sources and confirming every name, date, figure and claim against them. Anything that cannot be confirmed is cut, softened, or marked as disputed.
Accuracy and neutrality review
Reading the entry as a whole for balance: whether the framing favors one company, whether a contested claim is presented as settled, whether the language has drifted toward promotion or dismissal.
Periodic re-checking
Returning to older entries as new archival material, court records, oral histories and scholarship appear, and updating the last-reviewed date whether or not anything changed.

What an entry has to meet

An entry is published only once it clears the following bar, and an entry that cannot clear it is either narrowed until it can or held back.

  • At least two independent sources support the substance of the entry. Two outlets repeating the same announcement count as one.
  • Dates are verified to the precision claimed. A day is given only where documentation supports the day; otherwise the entry gives a month or a year and shows which it is claiming.
  • Contested points are labeled as contested, with the competing accounts described rather than resolved by preference.
  • Figures that cannot be verified are written qualitatively instead of guessed, and widely quoted estimates are presented as estimates.
  • Claims about people are limited to their documented professional work.
  • The prose is original throughout. Nothing is copied or closely reworded from any source.

Why entries carry no personal bylines

A byline is a promise about the person who wrote something. Attaching invented names, portraits or credentials to reference entries would be a false promise, and the archive will not do it. Authority here is meant to come from the sources listed under each entry and from a process a reader can inspect, not from a name a reader has no way to check. Collective responsibility also matches what happens over time: an entry written in one year may be corrected, expanded and re-reviewed several times afterward, and the archive as a whole answers for the result.

Specialists and archivists

Some periods are genuinely hard to document: the electro-mechanical era, regional markets outside North America and Japan, and working conditions inside studios that have since closed. Curators, archivists, academic researchers and people who worked in the industry are welcome to write to contact@maticpayu.com, whether to point at material the archive has missed, to flag a claim that survives mainly through repetition, or to offer a firsthand account that can be attributed and checked.

How to challenge an entry

Readers do not need credentials to be right. If something looks wrong, write to corrections@maticpayu.com, name the entry, copy in the specific sentence you are challenging, and point to a source if you have one. Every report is read. Confirmed errors are fixed and, where the change is substantive, noted rather than made silently. The corrections policy explains how the different kinds of change are handled and what you can reasonably expect afterward.